CIICII № 01 · The Gap · The Substrate · The Authority to Act
A desk at night — a laptop open on code and an AI assistant in front of a monitor with SPC charts and an AI agent's fault diagnosis, a wafer, a waffle pack of dies and three packaged chips — before a glass wall, a row of semiconductor bonders and a wafer-handling AMR with a robot arm
CII

ControlledIndustrialIntelligence

Inaugural Issuen2t.net/ark:66356/c100010

Industrial AI

From Intelligence to Action.

cii.network

Published byCII NETWORK

Founding Note

CII № 01

Inaugural Issue

Founding Note

Artificial intelligence is advancing at extraordinary speed.
Industrial AI is not keeping pace.

AI research, across academia and industry, continues to break new ground, with many results performing strongly in benchmarks and real-world applications.

Industrial practitioners seek productivity gains from AI, but must contend with complex industrial data, uncertain outcomes, and potential risks.

As Industrial AI moves from breakthroughs to real-world deployment, explainability, verifiability, and controllability become essential.

This is where
Controlled Industrial Intelligence
begins.

n2t.net/ark:66356/c10002d

In this issue

CII № 01

Contents

  1. Define the Problem

    The Gap

  2. Build the Foundation

    The Substrate

  3. Govern the Action

    The Authority to Act

  4. CII Atlas

Engineers compare a seven-axis research robot’s digital model with a physical test on a workbench

Publisher

CII NETWORK

CII NETWORK is a Swiss association dedicated to exploring and advancing Controlled Industrial Intelligence, connecting practitioners across industry and academia worldwide to bring intelligence into action.

Network Members

  • Quality and Data Analytics Lab · HKUST
  • AI & Mobility Lab · TUM
  • Chinese Academy of Intelligent Decisions & Control · Taipei
  • ASCETEX INTERNATIONAL LIMITED · Hong Kong
cii.networkDistributed to leaders and practitioners across industry and academia.
n2t.net/ark:66356/c10003t

Part 01 · Define the Problem

01

The Gap

Between Intelligence and Action

01 · The Gap

Why is Industrial AI
hard to deploy?

AI capabilities are advancing rapidly,
but moving from intelligence to action
brings new challenges to deployment.

AI is scaling fast

AI can now understand and generate language, images, video and code, reason across complex tasks, and increasingly use tools and software.

88%of respondents report their organization uses AI in at least one business function.
75%of surveyed enterprise AI users can now complete tasks they could not before.

Stanford AI Index 2026, on McKinsey data · OpenAI, The State of Enterprise AI 2025

Industrial AI is scaling
more slowly

AI is already used in manufacturing for inspection, predictive maintenance, production optimization and engineering design, but at limited scale, with many projects still in proof of concept or pilot.

29%are using AI/ML at the facility or network level.
23%are piloting AI/ML technologies.

Deloitte, 2025 Smart Manufacturing Survey

NORTH AMERICASOUTH AMERICAEUROPEAFRICAASIAUNITED STATESCANADAMEXICOBay AreaFrontier AI · ChipsSeattleCloud · AI infrastructure · AerospaceBostonAI · RoboticsMontrealDeep learning · AerospaceTorontoMachine learning · AutomotivePittsburghRobotics · AutonomyDetroit–Ann ArborAutomotive · Autonomous vehiclesAtlantaAI research · AerospaceTexasSemiconductors · Energy · ManufacturingPhoenixChips · Advanced packagingNORTH AMERICAGERMANYFRANCEUNITED KINGDOMITALYPOLANDSPAINLondonAI research · StartupsParisAI models · AerospaceEindhovenLithography · High-tech systemsMunich–Stuttgart–HeilbronnAutomation · AutomotiveDresdenSemiconductors · MicroelectronicsZurichRobotics · ControlMilanMachinery · AutomationEUROPECHINAJAPANKOREATAIWANVIETNAMTHAILANDMALAYSIAPHILIPPINESBeijingAI models · ResearchYangtze River DeltaAI · Semiconductors · RoboticsGreater Bay AreaElectronics · EVs · RoboticsSeoulChips · AutomotiveTokyoRobotics · Chip equipmentOsaka–NagoyaAutomotive · AutomationTaipei–HsinchuSemiconductors · Advanced fabsSingaporeAI hub · SemiconductorsHanoi–Bac NinhElectronics · ExportsHo Chi Minh CityElectronics · ManufacturingPenangSemiconductors · ElectronicsBangkokAutomotive · ElectronicsEAST & SOUTHEAST ASIA

The geography of Industrial AI
sits at the intersection of AI capability and industry base.

AI capability maps technology and talent; industry base captures industrial depth and potential. Their overlap is where Industrial AI matters most.

AI capability
Research · Talent · Models · Compute
Industry base
Manufacturing · Automation · Robotics · Semiconductors · Process Industries

Fig. 1The geography of Industrial AI

01 · The Gap

CII № 01 · Controlled Industrial Intelligence

NORTH AMERICASOUTH AMERICAEUROPEAFRICAASIAUNITED STATESCANADAMEXICOBay AreaFrontier AI · ChipsSeattleCloud · AI infrastructure · AerospaceBostonAI · RoboticsMontrealDeep learning · AerospaceTorontoMachine learning · AutomotivePittsburghRobotics · AutonomyDetroit–Ann ArborAutomotive · Autonomous vehiclesAtlantaAI research · AerospaceTexasSemiconductors · Energy · ManufacturingPhoenixChips · Advanced packagingNORTH AMERICAGERMANYFRANCEUNITED KINGDOMITALYPOLANDSPAINLondonAI research · StartupsParisAI models · AerospaceEindhovenLithography · High-tech systemsMunich–Stuttgart–HeilbronnAutomation · AutomotiveDresdenSemiconductors · MicroelectronicsZurichRobotics · ControlMilanMachinery · AutomationEUROPECHINAJAPANKOREATAIWANVIETNAMTHAILANDMALAYSIAPHILIPPINESBeijingAI models · ResearchYangtze River DeltaAI · Semiconductors · RoboticsGreater Bay AreaElectronics · EVs · RoboticsSeoulChips · AutomotiveTokyoRobotics · Chip equipmentOsaka–NagoyaAutomotive · AutomationTaipei–HsinchuSemiconductors · Advanced fabsSingaporeAI hub · SemiconductorsHanoi–Bac NinhElectronics · ExportsHo Chi Minh CityElectronics · ManufacturingPenangSemiconductors · ElectronicsBangkokAutomotive · ElectronicsEAST & SOUTHEAST ASIA

The geography of Industrial AI
sits at the intersection of AI capability and industry base.

AI capability maps technology and talent; industry base captures industrial depth and potential. Their overlap is where Industrial AI matters most.

AI capability
Research · Talent · Models · Compute
Industry base
Manufacturing · Automation · Robotics · Semiconductors · Process Industries

Fig. 1The geography of Industrial AI

01 · The Gap

Between Intelligence and Action

The landscape of Industrial AI applications

Industrial AI is proving its value across many stages of production,
yet the breadth and depth of adoption still vary across use cases.

SizePotential industrial impact (relative)
ColorHigher adoptionLower adoption
ReferenceCase or survey data available

Observe

Sense the physical world

Understand

Turn data into insights

Advise

Generate and evaluate options

Optimize

Improve industrial outcomes

Act

Execute in the physical world

Visual inspectionDefect detection and classification
Metrology & dimensional inspection
In-line testing
Environmental monitoring
Predictive maintenanceEquipment health and remaining useful life
Process quality analytics
Anomaly detection
Root-cause analysis
Failure diagnosis
Asset performance management
Engineering copilotsDesign, programming and troubleshooting
Industrial knowledge assistants
Industrial code generation
Simulation & virtual validationProcess, line and factory simulation
Design optimization
Safety & risk analysis
Compliance & documentation
Production optimizationThroughput, cycle time and OEE
Energy optimization
Yield optimization
Material flow optimization
Production scheduling
Inventory optimization
Process parameter optimization
Quality prediction
Autonomous operationsSelf-directed production and operation
Closed-loop interventionDirect adjustment of physical processes
Learning-based adaptive control
Real-time optimization
Embodied task execution (VLA)
Adaptive manipulation
Autonomous intralogistics

01Proven value

Already widely deployed
in many industrial settings.

02Expanding frontier

Rapidly growing, with increasing
deployment across industries.

03Untapped potential

High potential impact,
but adoption remains limited.

Fig. 2The landscape of Industrial AI applications

01 · The Gap

CII № 01 · Controlled Industrial Intelligence

The landscape of Industrial AI applications

Industrial AI is proving its value across many stages of production,
yet the breadth and depth of adoption still vary across use cases.

SizePotential industrial impact (relative)
ColorHigher adoptionLower adoption
ReferenceCase or survey data available

Observe

Sense the physical world

Understand

Turn data into insights

Advise

Generate and evaluate options

Optimize

Improve industrial outcomes

Act

Execute in the physical world

Visual inspectionDefect detection and classification
Metrology & dimensional inspection
In-line testing
Environmental monitoring
Predictive maintenanceEquipment health and remaining useful life
Process quality analytics
Anomaly detection
Root-cause analysis
Failure diagnosis
Asset performance management
Engineering copilotsDesign, programming and troubleshooting
Industrial knowledge assistants
Industrial code generation
Simulation & virtual validationProcess, line and factory simulation
Design optimization
Safety & risk analysis
Compliance & documentation
Production optimizationThroughput, cycle time and OEE
Energy optimization
Yield optimization
Material flow optimization
Production scheduling
Inventory optimization
Process parameter optimization
Quality prediction
Autonomous operationsSelf-directed production and operation
Closed-loop interventionDirect adjustment of physical processes
Learning-based adaptive control
Real-time optimization
Embodied task execution (VLA)
Adaptive manipulation
Autonomous intralogistics

01Proven value

Already widely deployed
in many industrial settings.

02Expanding frontier

Rapidly growing, with increasing
deployment across industries.

03Untapped potential

High potential impact,
but adoption remains limited.

Fig. 2The landscape of Industrial AI applications

01 · The Gap

Between Intelligence and Action

The closer Industrial AI gets to action,the harder it becomes to deploy

Let’s push the boundary TOGETHER.

— CII NETWORK

01 · The Gap

CII № 01 · Controlled Industrial Intelligence

The closer Industrial AI gets to action,the harder it becomes to deploy

Let’s push the boundary TOGETHER.

— CII NETWORK

01 · The Gap

Between Intelligence and Action

Industrial control remains fragmented
across controllers, protocols and system layers.

n2t.net/ark:66356/c100047

Part 02 · Build the Foundation

02

The Substrate

Software-Defined Control Systems

02 · The Substrate

What carries intelligence into action?

Control systems connect computing to physical execution — and software-defined control offers a stronger foundation.

AI acts onExamplesActs throughControl layer

Digital systems

Information & transactions
Finance, procurement, planning
APIs & workflows

—

Physical operations

Physical processes & operations
Energy, logistics, buildings, process industries
OT & supervisory systems

Relevant

Machine control

Machines & motion
Industrial equipment, robotics, automation systems
Controllers & real‑time control

Critical

Our focus Where intelligence meets the physical world.

Table 1Industrial AI across digital and physical systems

How intelligence
reaches machines

AI analyzes data and proposes actions.Control systems observe machine states and execute commands in real time.

The rise of software‑defined
control systems

Decoupling from dedicated hardware enables broader data integration and more advanced computation.

Fig. 3The control substrate

Fig. 4From hardware-defined to software-defined control

Hard, soft and virtual PLCs will likely coexist in the future. Automation.com, 2025

01Compute

General‑purpose computing is now powerful enough for real‑time, deterministic control.

02Integration

Functions once split across controllers can now share one platform.

03Flexibility

Control capabilities can evolve through software updates, not hardware replacement.

02 · The Substrate

CII № 01 · Controlled Industrial Intelligence

How intelligence
reaches machines

AI analyzes data and proposes actions.Control systems observe machine states and execute commands in real time.

The rise of software‑defined
control systems

Decoupling from dedicated hardware enables broader data integration and more advanced computation.

Fig. 3The control substrate

Fig. 4From hardware-defined to software-defined control

Hard, soft and virtual PLCs will likely coexist in the future. Automation.com, 2025

01Compute

General‑purpose computing is now powerful enough for real‑time, deterministic control.

02Integration

Functions once split across controllers can now share one platform.

03Flexibility

Control capabilities can evolve through software updates, not hardware replacement.

02 · The Substrate

Software-Defined Control Systems

AI and control run on different clocks,
but they must work together

01DeloitteTech Trends 2026

Language and vision models work in “human time”, Ayanna Howard tells Deloitte. For a walking robot, “a one- or two-second delay means it drops something, crashes, or potentially hurts someone.”

02NVIDIAIGX ThorJetson ThorHoloscan

A real-time Linux kernel and isolated GPU partitions give real-time work “hard performance guarantees” beside AI. Holoscan runs from “AI reasoning” to “deterministic real-world actions”.

03BainFrom control to intelligence

“Industrial automation is no longer about controlling machines—it’s about orchestrating intelligence.” Bain sees “AI-native workflows” moving “from analytics layers into the operational core”.

04ARCSoftware-defined automation

One theme stood out to ARC: industrial AI “will scale only when intelligence can be connected to deterministic, real-time action on heterogeneous equipment.”

Asynchronous

Variable-latency

Real-time

Deterministic

A software-defined
control architecture

Unified compute, memory and control.

Runtime actions ↓Real-time data ↑

Fig. 5The clocks of AI and control

Fig. 6AI and control on one industrial PC

01Bring compute, control and memory closer

The same trend can be seen across computing architectures. In-memory computing (IMC) brings compute closer to memory; co-packaged optics (CPO) brings optical I/O closer to compute. For Industrial AI, compute, control and memory (CCM) can follow the same principle — bringing AI, machine data and real-time control closer together on one machine.

02Different loops, direct connection

AI runs asynchronously on the GPU/NPU, while control runs independently on real-time CPU cores with deterministic timing. They keep their own loops, but exchange machine data and AI commands directly through shared memory.

asynchronous · variable-latency~10–200 Hz~1 kHz – multi-kHz

02 · The Substrate

CII № 01 · Controlled Industrial Intelligence

AI and control run on different clocks,
but they must work together

01DeloitteTech Trends 2026

Language and vision models work in “human time”, Ayanna Howard tells Deloitte. For a walking robot, “a one- or two-second delay means it drops something, crashes, or potentially hurts someone.”

02NVIDIAIGX ThorJetson ThorHoloscan

A real-time Linux kernel and isolated GPU partitions give real-time work “hard performance guarantees” beside AI. Holoscan runs from “AI reasoning” to “deterministic real-world actions”.

03BainFrom control to intelligence

“Industrial automation is no longer about controlling machines—it’s about orchestrating intelligence.” Bain sees “AI-native workflows” moving “from analytics layers into the operational core”.

04ARCSoftware-defined automation

One theme stood out to ARC: industrial AI “will scale only when intelligence can be connected to deterministic, real-time action on heterogeneous equipment.”

Asynchronous

Variable-latency

Real-time

Deterministic

A software-defined
control architecture

Unified compute, memory and control.

Runtime actions ↓Real-time data ↑

Fig. 5The clocks of AI and control

Fig. 6AI and control on one industrial PC

01Bring compute, control and memory closer

The same trend can be seen across computing architectures. In-memory computing (IMC) brings compute closer to memory; co-packaged optics (CPO) brings optical I/O closer to compute. For Industrial AI, compute, control and memory (CCM) can follow the same principle — bringing AI, machine data and real-time control closer together on one machine.

02Different loops, direct connection

AI runs asynchronously on the GPU/NPU, while control runs independently on real-time CPU cores with deterministic timing. They keep their own loops, but exchange machine data and AI commands directly through shared memory.

asynchronous · variable-latency~10–200 Hz~1 kHz – multi-kHz

02 · The Substrate

Software-Defined Control Systems

The Software-Defined
Control Ecosystem

From hardware and OS to software-defined control and applications.

Applications

Software-defined control

Operating Systems

Hardware

Machines, systems and industrial applications

Motion and logic as reusable software

Real-time execution platforms

x86 and Arm compute platforms

For further insights and practical applications, contact us.
contact@cii.network

02 · The Substrate

CII № 01 · Controlled Industrial Intelligence

The Software-Defined
Control Ecosystem

From hardware and OS to software-defined control and applications.

Applications

Software-defined control

Operating Systems

Hardware

Machines, systems and industrial applications

Motion and logic as reusable software

Real-time execution platforms

x86 and Arm compute platforms

For further insights and practical applications, contact us.
contact@cii.network

02 · The Substrate

Software-Defined Control Systems

n2t.net/ark:66356/c10005n

Part 03 · Govern the Action

03

The Authority to Act

Evidence, Risk, and Human Oversight

03 · The Authority to Act

How can intelligence be authorized to act?

Capability does not imply authority. A well-defined authorization mechanism enables AI to act autonomously within clear conditions and boundaries.

03 · The Authority to Act

CII № 01 · Controlled Industrial Intelligence

Autonomous AI is already at work

Yokogawa × Aramco2025

10%–15%

“reduction in its amine and steam usage” at Aramco’s Fadhili Gas Plant, where multiple autonomous control AI agents now run acid gas removal.

Fadhili Gas Plant · Aramco, via Yokogawa

Caterpillar2026

Nearly700

“Cat autonomous trucks are in operation around the world and together they have safely hauled over 11 billion tonnes of material.”

Autonomous Cat truck · RobSimmons223311, CC BY-SA 4.0

Figure × BMW2025

90,000+

“parts loaded” by Figure 02 on an active assembly line at BMW Group Plant Spartanburg: “1,250+ hours of runtime” in an 11-month deployment.

Figure 02 at BMW Spartanburg · Figure AI

The broader agentic AI landscape

WEF × Capgemini2026

ACAP

Introducing its Agent Capability and Authorization Profile, the WEF notes that organizations “face new challenges in defining the conditions under which these agents are authorized to act and in ensuring this authority is enforced as systems evolve.”

Gartner2025

Over40%

“of agentic AI projects will be canceled by the end of 2027, due to escalating costs, unclear business value or inadequate risk controls.”

Dynatrace2026

Only13%

“of organizations use fully autonomous agents,” and “69% of agentic AI–powered decisions are still verified by humans.”

03 · The Authority to Act

Evidence, Risk, and Human Oversight

But authority is still an open question

Autonomy is already here, but it is uneven

Aramco says the Fadhili system “has now been permanently adopted.” It went in step by step: trained and checked on a simulator, then connected to the plant’s existing control system. Haulage, process control and general AI agents are different problems. Autonomy succeeds first where the task is clear, the setting controlled and the boundary verifiable.

2%of organizations have deployed AI agents at scale, 12% at partial scale. Most are still piloting (23%) or exploring (61%), in a survey of 1,500 executives.Capgemini, Jul 2025

Authority is becoming everyone’s question

The WEF’s ACAP spells out an agent’s permissions, checkpoints, owners and evidence; NIST calls for “appropriate identification and authorization controls.” From traditional automation to today’s AI agents, governing autonomous behavior has long been a central challenge.

Human approval is not the final answer

Claude Code users approve 93% of permission prompts, later 97%: approval fatigue, “where people stop paying close attention to what they’re approving.” Developers are not plant operators, but if every low-risk step needs a click, the approvals that matter get lost. Authority should also let work that is fit to run alone stop waiting.

13.6%of dangerous commands caught by human review in a controlled experiment; auto mode caught 89%.Anthropic, 2026

03 · The Authority to Act

CII № 01 · Controlled Industrial Intelligence

Five approaches

Exploring Authorityexploration

From automation to AI, industry and academia have long explored how to guide and constrain machine behavior.

01 · Control engineering

Rules

Interlocks and permissive checks enforce the conditions under which a machine may operate.

Control Engineering

02 · Process control

Optimization

A controller uses a process model to meet an objective within defined operating constraints.

Qin & Badgwell, 2003

04 · Machine learning

Behavioral Learning

Data, rewards and human feedback shape behaviour, guided by preferences and explicit principles.

DeepMind, 2017Anthropic, 2022

05 · Robotics · Aerospace

Uncertainty & Runtime Assurance

Uncertainty estimates and runtime monitors help determine when to seek assistance or switch to a backup.

KnowNo, 2023NASA, Runtime Assurance

03 · The Authority to Act

Evidence, Risk, and Human Oversight

Five open questions

Challenges That Remain

As AI moves from reasoning to action, fundamental questions remain.

  1. How accurate is accurate enough?
  2. If not accuracy, what should we measure?
  3. Where are the boundaries, and who sets them?
  4. What should humans do: approve, supervise, or step in?
  5. Who is accountable when AI acts?

The question behind them

Why is moving from intelligence to action so difficult?

Part of the answer may lie in

authority.

03 · The Authority to Act

CII № 01 · Controlled Industrial Intelligence

fromIntelligence needs authority to act

Intelligence proposes.

Authority permits.

Action executes.

IntelligenceAuthorityControlFeedback closes the loop1Observe2Reason3Propose4Verify5Authorize6Act7Feedback
  1. 01Observe
  2. 02Reason
  3. 03Propose
  4. 04Verify
  5. 05Authorize
  6. 06Act
  7. 07Feedback
Fig. 7 Only permitted actions reach Act. Feedback closes the loop.

03 · The Authority to Act

Evidence, Risk, and Human Oversight

A cleanroom wafer-transfer robot carries a silicon wafer toward the open receiving station of semiconductor equipment.

Real-world case

Authority-Gated Fault Management

Communication faults in semiconductor manufacturing

01 The challenge

In semiconductor manufacturing, AI can quickly diagnose communication faults and recommend corrective actions. But with expensive equipment and costly downtime, engineers are cautious about allowing AI to act autonomously.

02 The approach

Working together, engineers and data scientists defined a 3×3 authority matrix based on evidence strength and action risk. The matrix determines how far AI can proceed—from monitoring and proposing fixes to autonomous execution or human approval.

With sufficient evidence and the required checks, AI can handle low- and medium-risk recovery actions autonomously. High-risk actions still require human approval.

Evidence
strength
Action risk
LowMediumHigh
StrongExecute+ post-checkafter verificationExecuteafter verificationHumanapproval
ModerateProposePropose+ verifyHumanapproval
WeakMonitorMonitorHumanattention
  • AI executes
  • AI proposes
  • AI monitors
  • Human decides
Fig. 8 Case-specific authority matrix. Execution remains subject to required checks and granted scope.

For more cases and practical insights, contact us.

Atlas, Rockefeller Center, New York (Lee Lawrie, 1937). Shouldering the celestial sphere, the figure echoes the center’s art theme: New Frontiers and the March of Civilization.

n2t.net/ark:66356/c100062

The exchange

CII Atlas

Connecting Needs with Solutions

CII Atlas

Connecting

  1. NeedsReal industrial challenges
  2. MatchingConnecting needs and expertise
  3. SolutionsResearch and technical solutions
  4. ValidationTested in real environments
  5. DeploymentIntelligence into action

Test · Refine · Repeat

Visitors worldwide

ControlledIndustrialIntelligence

CII · № 01

Published byCII NETWORKControlled Industrial Intelligence NetworkA Swiss association.Privacy

CII · № 01

Subscribe for updates

Receive a short note when a new issue of CII is published.

1/–